Notes on the Front

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU

Making Education Costly – Sabotaging Our Future

A couple of days ago I discussed a proposal to make childcare affordable.  We all know that Irish childcare is one of the most expensive in Europe.  However, when it comes to children we have more problems.  For it appears that households in Ireland find it extremely difficult to afford education.

Eurostat, based on the Survey of Income and Living Conditions, has produced a new dataset:  difficulty paying for formal education (thanks to Conor McCabe’s Facebook post for alerting me to this).  The data surveys households’ ability to cover the costs of formal education using six categories ranging from great difficulty to very easily. 

  Education Costs 1

61 percent of Irish households with children are covering the cost of formal education with difficulty.  The only country near us is that other liberal market economy – the UK.  This is twice the level of our EU peer group with a mean average of 27 percent.  And compared to Sweden, with only 12 percent of households finding it difficult, we are in a different, distant and much lower league.

  Education Costs 2

At one end, 14 percent of Irish households with children are covering the cost of formal education with great difficulty, compared to 5 percent in our EU peer group countries.  At the other end only 3.5 percent of Irish households can afford formal education very easily; in our peer group the figure is 22 percent (in Sweden it is 46 percent).

No matter how you juggle these stats there is only one word for this:  obscene.  It is an attack on parents’ living standards, it is an attack on children’s’ educational opportunities.  And it is an attack on the productive economy which, in the future, will rely even more on education and innovation as the driving force in growth.  If you wanted to sabotage our economic future, you couldn’t do better than making education difficult to afford.

Unfortunately, the Eurostat data doesn’t break down difficulty and ease by educational level.  It would be interesting to see how households cope with primary, secondary and third-level education costs.  However, such is the breadth of difficulty for Irish households (over 60 percent), we would probably find it difficult across the board.

So whether it is childcare or formal education, Irish costs are high and households are struggling.  There is no sense in saying that ‘children are our future’ when we are making that future unaffordable.   

In this post I wrote about how the broad Left is struggling to get its economic message across.  Well, here’s an opportunity:  progressives and trade unionists should champion the living standards of families –affordable childcare, free education , family benefits (pay-related maternity and paternity benefits, a new child-raising allowance), and greater work-life balance – labour flexibility on families’ own terms.

For the stakes are high – today’s living standards, children’s’ life-chances, tomorrow’s prosperity. Indeed, they couldn’t be higher.

4 responses to “Making Education Costly – Sabotaging Our Future”

  1. Colum McCaffery Avatar

    The problem, Michael, is that no one – absolutely no one – will disagree with you. Campaigning on issues can never lead to major change because such campaigning is part of our conservative system; it is how dissent is managed. In a previous post you spoke about the need for a left narrative. I think what is needed is a plausible overall argument to be addressed to anyone who is amenable.
    There is unanimity on the issues but for most people addressing them comes with a condition: that nothing structural changes. This is how MDH is applauded for what he says and then ignored.

    Like

  2. Michael Taft Avatar

    Colum – I fear you make an excellent point. How do we punch through this? What is that plausible overall argument? No pressure.

    Like

  3. Michael Waddell Avatar
    Michael Waddell

    An alternative narrative, to the current dominant neoliberal consensus, will only be developed if trade unions, campaigning organisations, left wing groups/parties unite around a common radical, transformative programme.
    It is almost a hundred years now since the 1st Dáil adopted the Democratic Programme, which itself was a watered-down version of a more radical first draft. We need a new Democratic Programme for our times. Some people somewhere need to work on this.

    Like

  4. Colum McCaffery Avatar

    While the consensus is compatible with neo-liberalism, it is not neo-liberalism. Campaigning is not the antidote. It is part of the system. Priorities are decided and issues resolved by way of putting pressure on the political class/establishment/government. It guarantees that nothing changes. All parties in Ireland – without exception – are wedded to campaigning and the operation of the cargo/pressure system. Working class has now been reduced to the status of a pressure group. I’ve tried to argue that Labour now has little to lose and should strike out and become the one party of opposition; there’s little support for it and the party is fixated on a traditional/familiar left approach.
    Here’s our system:
    https://colummccaffery.wordpress.com/2017/11/08/strokes-pressure-groups-lobbyists-advocates-and-activists-versus-the-citizen/
    This was adopted at a Labour Conference but it is generally ignored: https://colummccaffery.wordpress.com/2017/04/25/pay-attention-or-attention-to-pay-the-irish-labour-party-may-have-changed-public-discourse-on-economic-inequality/
    I’m still working on it all, Michael.

    Like

Leave a reply to Michael Taft Cancel reply

Navigation

About

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU