Notes on the Front

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU

Quick Notes on the CSO’s Employment Numbers – Some Commentators Should Look Harder

Relief throughout the nation – employment rising, joblessness falling; the new CSO release should give us something to cheer about.  Some quick notes on what the numbers are telling us:

Employment has risen by 58,000 – or 3.2 percent.  This is good but puzzling – how does this square with an economy that is still stagnating?

Agriculture employment – an area where the CSO has warned we should tread carefully – has risen by 25,000, or 29.4 percent.  Self-employment (without paid employees) rose by 28,400 or 14.4 percent.   This makes up a substantial amount of the employment rise.  Does this skewer the overall results?  Some say no – the overall figure of a 58,000 increase stands, it’s just a problem in the distribution of gains in different economic sectors (e.g. agriculture, industry, retail, etc.).  

This may be so.  However, the CSO Quarterly National Household Survey registers an increase in the number of employees at 27,200, or 1.8 percent.  The CSO’s Earning and Labour Costs, also released yesterday, showed a similar number of non-agriculture employees rising by 21,900 or 1.4 percent (the Earnings and Labour Costs only measures firms with three employees or more which may account for the small difference).  So the CSO’s warnings seem valid – agriculture and self-employment numbers are artificially inflating the job numbers.

Nonetheless, the rise in employees is the biggest since the crisis started.  What were the biggest growth categories?  The Hospitality sector grew by 15,900 – or 72 percent of the total increase.    This is the lowest paid, lowest value-added sector of the market economy.   Other categories to gain were manufacturing and professional & scientific – which provides some balance.  Only 3 out of the remaining categories (12) saw employment increases.  So the employment rise is not spread out.

Big question:  is this increase the bounce after years of recession?  How much higher will this bounce go?  And when will it settle down?  The Government and the ESRI predict that the rise in employment will be lower in 2014 than this year.  Again, this may be due to the statistical bump the CSO has warned about this year.

Unemployment has thankfully fallen – by 18,000.  But to what extent is this due to the rise in the number of employees and the number of people emigrating?  We should expect more than 60,000 people emigrating this year in the key age category of 15-24 years.

Tentative conclusions – the employment rise looks to be settled in but it is not spread throughout most categories; it is concentrated primarily in the low-paid hospitality sector with small gains in the manufacturing and professional & scientific sections.  The statistical problems will go away in the final quarter of this year so it won’t be until next year until we get a sense of the real trend.  Employment will increase but key questions remain:  where will it increase, what kind of jobs will be created, what value-added will be produced and what wage levels will be paid?

Final Note:  we all expect Government Ministers and backbenchers, and opposition politicians to make political hay with these types of states, moulding them to their agenda.  No problem in that (unless it amounts to outright fabrication); that is the stuff of political debate.  However, it is incumbent upon commentators to provide a more exacting analysis and not merely repeat headline numbers.  Unfortunately, that doesn’t happen much and the debate is the poorer for that.

3 responses to “Quick Notes on the CSO’s Employment Numbers – Some Commentators Should Look Harder”

  1. Sparky sparks Avatar
    Sparky sparks

    Nice to see Unite standing up for the incredibly privileged workers in ESB.
    It really is time that the rich people had someone in their corner!
    The 99% have their way for far too long. Time for the 1% to again reassert their rightful dominance.
    Shure all those poor slobs only waste the electricity anyway on their PS2s, flat screen TVs, and microwaved pot-noddle. Why, they can drink their festive cans of Dutch Gold at room temperature (seeing as those rooms will be bracing in any case, due to the lack of heating). And candles will do them fine to read their red-top rags by, it was far from florescent lights that their fathers were rared!
    A spot of Unite-inspired blackout will put those wage slaves back in their box and teach them a thing or two about respecting their betters!
    Michael, you should indeed be proud to be associated with the privileged and their just fight for more privileges!
    “Show us the money” will forever be our battle-cry!

    Like

  2. Paddy Healy Avatar
    Paddy Healy

    Almost 50,000 people are on job activation schemes. At the press Conference CSO admitted to me that the 50,000 are not included in the unemployment figures but are included in the number in employment. Based on replies to PQs put down by Seamus healy TD The numbers on schemes are as follows:
    Job Activation Schemes
    June 30 2011 June 30 2012 June 30,2013
    36,750 48,784 49,625
    Increase over 2 years Q22013-Q22011 = 12,875
    Essentially 49,625 should be added to the number unemployed. This will significantly increase the number unemployed as a fraction of the labour force.
    Workers on schemes are specifically excluded from the category of employees under legislation as this would entitle them to the protections of employment law

    Like

  3. Ciaran Avatar

    Great post, Michael. Nice to see some scrutiny of these figures, instead of the cheerleading press releases carried by RTÉ et al.
    But how remiss of you to delete the part of your post which discussed the ESB dispute at length. This kind of mean trick just makes the above comment by ‘Sparky sparks’ look like hit-and-run trolling. For shame, Michael, for shame.

    Like

Leave a comment

Navigation

About

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU