Notes on the Front

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU

It’s Official. Government Employment Policy is Failing (so says the Government)

It’s official.  The
Government’s employment policy is failing. 
This finding comes from the Government itself, in the form of projections
contained in yesterday’s Medium Term Fiscal Framework.  The projections are chilling and
depressing.  Let’s first turn to employment.

MTFS 1

In April last year, the Government was somewhat bullish
about employment growth; projecting that the numbers at work would grow by
102,000 by 2015.  After the launch of the
Jobs Initiative and the Action Plan for Jobs, the Government lowered their
forecast to 67,000.  Yesterday, they
lowered their forecast again – to 18,000.

In 2011, there were 1,810,000 people working (this includes
full-time and part-time).  By 2015, the
Government expects this to rise to 1,828,000. 
After all the Government’s initiatives, IDA job announcements,
protestations that jobs remains at the core of public policy – the Government
itself admits that net job creation will only be 18,000 by 2015.

Let’s look at the annual projections.

MTFS 2

In April last year, the Government expected employment growth
to start this year, increasing by 37,000 in 2015 alone.   Now, the Government accepts that employment will
fall this year (by 22,000) and won’t start growing until 2014.  In 2015 alone net job creation will only be
24,000.

This is grim.  During
the life-time of this government, employment will rise only marginally. 

We can now see why unemployment is barely moving.  In April last year, the Government projected
that the unemployment rate would be 10 percent in 2015 – not great at all, but
at least showing some movement downwards. 
Now the Government projects unemployment to be 13 percent.  That shows almost no movement at all.

MTFS 3

When the Government took office unemployment was 14.2
percent.  By 2015 it is expected to be 13
percent – a reduction of one percent.

We should acknowledge the difficulties of reducing
unemployment – especially after it skyrocketed under the previous government
following the property crash. 
Unemployment is like a huge ship – you first have to stop it, turn it
around and start it going in a different direction; not an easy thing to do in
the short-term. 

However, the Government has pursued policies that have (a)
not addressed the underlying problem and (b) actually exacerbated the
situation.  In regards the former, they
have treated unemployment as a supply-side problem (issues of training, wage
levels, employers’ PRSI, etc.) when in fact it is a demand-side problem.  When you have nearly 30 unemployed for every
job vacancy, the problem lies in the lack of demand for labour.

But they have actually worsened the situation by budgetary
measures that have actually depressed the demand for labour – cuts in
investment and public spending along with regressive tax increases.  ICTU projected that the last budget cut
nearly 30,000 jobs out of the economy while the Nevin Economic Research Institute
projects that Budget 2013 could cut another 29,000 out of the economy.  Don’t be surprised if unemployment remains
high the Government pursues job-cutting measures.

The Government has admitted its current policies are not
working.  They are not generating much in
the way of jobs, they are not reducing unemployment.  Following this admission, they should now
launch a new jobs policy, or at least launch a short, sharp national debate
over what that policy should be.

But if official spokespeople come forth and state that they
remain focussed on jobs, that they will double their efforts, that jobs remain
at the heart of policy – we will know: 
not only do we have a Government out of touch with reality, it is even
out of touch with its own official projections.

2 responses to “It’s Official. Government Employment Policy is Failing (so says the Government)”

  1. eamonn moran Avatar
    eamonn moran

    “ICTU projected that the last budget cut nearly 30,000 jobs out of the economy while the Nevin Economic Research Institute projects that Budget 2013 could cut another 29,000 out of the economy. Don’t be surprised if unemployment remains high the Government pursues job-cutting measures.”
    Great article Michael but there are 2 important elements missing.
    The first is the age cohort of those that have lost their Jobs. Of the 300,000 less employed today 227,000 are people in their 20’s. This is the case because what both public and private employers have done is reduce employment rather than reduce real wages.
    Labour costs have not come down and the public sector pay and pensions bill has only come down marginally.
    By foisting all the pain on the younger generation they are cutting growth to the real economy. How can the economy grow when there are 227,000 less people in their 20’s working now than 2007?
    There is a very different policy pursued by governments in central and northern Europe in times of recession. They implement real pay cuts (especially to better paid workers ) instead of letting young people go, and refusing to hire them.
    They protect jobs in exchange for reducing pay.
    This is the most obvious and cost effective means of improving our unemployment problem but since Unions and private sector employers are dead set against it it wont happen. I am appealing again to you to talk to union leaders and make the economic argument in favor of changing policy. Even at this late stage it could make a massive difference.

    Like

  2. Ciaran Avatar

    Eamonn,
    I’m not sure unions would get much support from their members for reducing their pay rates!
    Not that I’m being facetious or querulous about your point – I agree that youth unemployment is a serious problem in this country (not to mention elsewhere in Europe), but the Government have not been signaling any intent to divert monies ‘saved’ from any mooted cuts, other than to pay down odious debt.
    As things stand, pay cuts in the public sector would only lead to money being taken out of the local economy.

    Like

Leave a reply to Ciaran Cancel reply

Navigation

About

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU