Notes on the Front

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU

Investing in Another, Better Future

What if we bought a modern telecommunications system, bringing Next Generation Broadband to every household and business in the country?

  • What if we purchased a state-of-the-art waste and water system to secure an increasingly scarce resource?
  • What if we provided one-on-one intensive tutorials for all those with literacy and numeracy problems that keep them from entering the workforce?
  • What if we retrofitted every building with conservation deficiencies (some 800,000 or so) to reduce our reliance on fossil-fuel imports?
  • What if we established a strategic investment bank to focus on specialist business and infrastructural investments?
  • What if we established a public enterprise company that would oversee directly or through partnerships the exploitation of our natural resources in the public and environmental interest – especially the potentially rich ocean-floor deposits?
  • What if we rolled out a national early childhood education and childcare network as a public service?

What if we implemented Fianna Fail’s Primary Care Strategy – 500 community medical centres throughout the country, one for every 10,000 people, providing free GP and related out-patient services (this strategy has been hanging around for a decade)?

You’d probably say – gee, that would be great. And you'd be right. These would increase our productivity, reduce inefficient spending (e.g. band-aiding 100-year water pipes), improve people's work-skills, health and education, create thousands of jobs, promote enterprise start-ups and expansions; most of all, it would prepare us for a highly competitive future marketplace.

But the next thing you would say – how in the world could we afford all that?  Well, we can. In fact, we can’t afford not to pursue these investments. Here's how (and this is only one outline – there can be others and better ones). 


We can access more than €100 billion for investment purposes (give or take a few billion) in combined public and private savings to purchase (invest in) the above assets. Of course, we wouldn’t need, nor would it be desirable to use all that money. A 5-year investment programme of between €15 and €20 billion would make up a relatively small proportion of the amount available to us. So what is that €100 billion made up of?

  • Public savings and cash stand at €20.3 billion in 2011 and is estimated to be €14.6 billion by 2015. This is made up of the discretionary portfolio of the National Pension Reserve Fund (that is, money not tied up in bank recapitalisation) along with Exchequer cash balances and other liquid assets.
  • There is the potential of an additional €3 billion available owing to reduced interest rates under the EU-IMF deal. If the Government has confidence in its own budgetary projections, this money will not be needed for deficit reduction purposes.
  • And then there’s the vast amount of private savings – in pension and insurance funds.

Daniel Gross of the Centre of European Policy Studies has found that Irish pension and insurance funds own approximately €100 billion in foreign assets – 25 percent in non-Irish Government debt (e.g. German Bunds, US Treasuries, etc.) with the remainder in foreign equities. A small proportion of this could be redirected into Irish infrastructural and enterprise investment.

Gross proposes that pension/insurance funds ‘should somehow be induced’ to invest in the Irish economy. This is a euphemism for ‘directed’ investment or financial repression. But given that pension funds have already been expressed interest in directing money into Irish investment, we would be pushing at an open door.

We could go further, as suggested here, and abolish the pension level and substitute a mandatory bond purchase from the pension/insurance funds on a long-term basis with interest rates tied to German or bail-out interest levels. For the funds, this would mean that they would have an asset on the book (whereas the current pension levy represents a drain on income) while earning interest each year.

For the contributors into the funds, it would be a bit of a boon. Pension funds especially seem to have a tough time earning returns. Over the last 10 years they have only managed an annual 1.1 percent return. But when you factor in inflation, the real returns have been negative. One can only guess how the latest dive on the equity markets will affect returns.

By investing into the Irish economy, the pension funds would be getting a much better return – from 2.5 percent (German levels) to 4 percent (bail-out levels). That would be a better performance than Conor McCabe’s ‘coked-up futures deal on Wall Street’.

So a multi-billion, multi-annual investment programme is more than do-able. With half coming from public savings, we wouldn’t incur any extra borrowing costs on this (this is money we already have). The other half would make up less than 10 percent of what pension/insurance funds already invest in foreign assets.

In addition, much of this investment could come from via private sources.  For instance, IBEC claims a Next Generation Broadband network would cost about €2.2 billion. A public enterprise company could be set up to roll this out but private investors, looking for a potentially positive long-term return, could also buy into the company with minority stakes. Ditto for specialist investment banks. There are other, strictly commercial, areas where we could get private investor buy-in.

The math looks good. The increase in our interest payments, depending on the amount of pension fund involvement, would amount to about €300 million a year. But each €1 billion in capital investment increases tax revenue by nearly €400 million in the first year alone, increase the GDP, and lowers public spending (though lower unemployment costs). The return would greatly exceed interest payments. Investment, therefore, not only increases growth, productivity and employment – it is  a tool to repair public finances.

We need this investment to increase our competitiveness, to drive down unemployment, to repair our public finances.

Now what we need is the Government to grasp this opportunity. With austerity pulling us down a fiscal cul-de-sac, this programme can get us back on the high road of recovery.

3 responses to “Investing in Another, Better Future”

  1. Justin Collery Avatar

    “mandatory bond purchase from the pension/insurance funds”
    This is exactly the reason I will never put another cent into an Irish pension fund. Your suggestion is the same as a tax, and as one cannot move money out of a pension once it is there, it’s a sitting duck.
    “By investing into the Irish economy, the pension funds would be getting a much better return”
    If this is true, and it may be, no need for inducements or mandatory bonds. Money follows returns.
    The fact is, once money is being directed for politic ends rather than commercial ends it is a tax. The correcting mechanism of the market, i.e. refusal to invest in a project for any reason, is short circuited. This will inevitably lead to bad investments.
    The programs you suggest have merit. Just issue a specific bond for each one, allow anybody to invest in it. If the numbers are as good as you claim, pensions, and others, will invest in the hope of a good return.
    Forcing purchases is appropriation of assets by the state and should be resisted at all turns.
    Thanks,
    JC

    Like

  2. Michael Taft Avatar

    JC – Thanks for that. Yes, issuing specific bonds has considerably merit. For instance, a Broadband Bond, a Specialist Banking Bond, a Green Bond. These proposals have been put in the past.
    I don’t agree, however, that a ‘mandatory bond purchase’ is a tax. The pension fund receives an asset which it can trade; it receives an interest payment every year (I’ve suggested between 2.5 and 4 percent), and the principle is repaid after 10 years. PAYE workers and self-employed don’t get all this when they get taxed.
    I’d love to believe that the market works as a perfectly as ‘money follows return’. However, the conduct of financial institutions over the last decade and more should suggest that we be wary of this. In the case of pension investments, the money seems to follow real losses. It’s not a great track record. Over the last 10 years had pension funds just invested in safe German debt (or Dutch or Swedish) there would have been no collapse.
    The principle of using our collective savings to invest in collective growth can be called ‘appropriation’. It can also be called good commercial sense.
    But I take your point re: merit. Let’s run with it and see how far it goes.

    Like

  3. Del Madden Avatar

    (On “mandatory bond purchase” with “suggested interest payment of between 2.4 & 4%”) – you would be prohibiting pension funds from investing in an asset with a larger potential return, which of course is completely outrageous, and absurd. Secondly, you’re assuming no losses on State projects in question. Taxpayers will be on the hook for these bond repayment, loss or not.
    (On private institutions making bad decisions in past decade) – I don’t see the logic in saying that the State, who have also made horrendous investment decisions with taxpayers money (not least bailing out failed private enterprises and bringing our nation to the brink of bankruptcy) have proven themselves capable or better in this regard. At least private institutions (are supposed to) have to worry about losing their own money if they fail, the State spends taxpayer money recklessly, as they’ve proven.
    (On “let’s run with it and see how far it goes”) – Let’s not. I don’t want my family’s savings spent on academic vanity projects/experiments. If the State was guaranteed a return on investment they wouldn’t have to worry, we’d all voluntarily hand over our savings for them to invest on our behalf, but people living in the real world know that the State isn’t immune from the possibility of investment losses.
    Your idea that we can and should expropriate and discourage the very savings that are necessary to grow our economy is troubling.

    Like

Leave a reply to Del Madden Cancel reply

Navigation

About

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU