Notes on the Front

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU

Share the Pain? Share This! : August 9th – The Recession Diaries

Recession 188 Maybe it’s the Leveller in me, but when times are hard we should all put our shoulder to the wheel, share out the pain and protect the lesser able in our community. Listening to the great debate over wages you’d think that everyone was a Leveller. There is so much ‘share the pain’ going around you’re likely to keel over on your way to the local newsagent. But, as always, in this crazy, mixed-up world, there is ‘pain’, there’s ‘paaaiiinnn’ and then there’s no pain at all. Now, thanks to the CSO’s latest Earnings and Labour Cost Survey, we can measures these gradations of pain or otherwise.

ELC 1 Our first stop is the manufacturing sector. We find that in the first three months this year basic hourly earnings increased by 2.7 percent. However, these gross figures don’t tell the full story. The CSO helpfully breaks down hourly earnings by strata. What do we find then?

Well, management and professional staff, who make up less than 25 percent of all employees in the manufacturing sector, took a substantial increase. All other employees took a hit:  clerical workers who earn only on a little over €37,000 took a 2.3 percent reduction, while production workers, who make up 60 percent of all manufacturing employees and who earn a little over €31,000, suffered a reduction of nearly 1 percent.

Now, we shouldn't begrudge anyone a pay increase. If an enterprise can afford it, they should do it – good for the Exchequer, good for the economy, good for the employees. But what’s good for some should be good for all in something approximating equal measure.

However, what we seem to be witnessing here is not only that some – who just happen to be at upper end of the enterprise food-chain – get increases while most others don’t; the majority of workers will lesser incomes are subsidising the pay increases of those with more.

Truly, those who have, receiveth more. And those who have less get less, indeed – they get more taken away. So let me speculate – admittedly, without any data to justify this, just a gut feeling; that were the Management strata broken down we would find managers earning more than the professionals and associated professionals; and that their increases would be higher still.

ELC 2 If there is pain to be had, it should be shared; and if there is some small benefit to be had in hard times, it should be shared as well. So what would happen if the total wage increases in the manufacturing sector were shared equally among all employees? It would come to an increase of 34 cents per hour which would, as can be seen, would disproportionately benefit those on the lowest wages.

I’m not proposing some kind of ultra-Maoist, everyone-eat-their-dinners-in-communal-barracks wage structure. But surely, especially in a recession, it makes more economic sense to ensure that those on the lowest wages get proportionally more as they are more likely to spend their money. If it goes to the highest groups, they are more likely to save it, or spend it on import-dense products and services.

ELC 3 The Financial sector paints a similar picture. There was a general 0.6 percent increase in wages. The Management / Professional strata – which makes up nearly half of all employees in the Financial Sector and earns an annualised €72,000 a year – was the only beneficiary of wage increases. Clerical staff, who earn less than their counterparts in the manufacturing sector, and Production workers (yes, there a few in the Financial sector) took a hit.

Again, and this is more pertinent in the Financial Sector, we might well find, if we had the data, that staff at the upper end of the Management strata gained an even higher percentage increase over the remainder in this strata.

Were the total wage increase shared out among all employees, the percentage increase for Clerical and Production staff would be 1.5 percent. This would at least help protect their living standards – which the Government was planning at that time to reduce with increased levies.

Ultimately, it’s a bit galling to hear these lectures from the upper economic echelons – especially as they continue to ‘grow’ their incomes at the expense of lower-paid employees in their own establishments.

ELC 4 And how irritating is it when the representatives of the managerial strata give out about employees’ pay, including public sector employees. As we saw above, the managerial strata gained while others fell. And public sector employees?

The marginal increase in public sector pay shouldn’t fool anyone. During this period the pension levy was applied which, because it’s not counted as a wage shift, does not show up. But cut wages it did. Public vs. private sector workers? The real divide is those that have the power to increase their wages and those that don’t – and most public and private sector employees are on the side of don’t.

So the next time you bump into IBEC or ISME or some Dublin Consensus-ist on the street, urging you to ‘share the pain’ – just laugh in their faces and tell them to sort out their own house first.

8 responses to “Share the Pain? Share This! : August 9th – The Recession Diaries”

  1. Mack Avatar

    Not to forget those who have had their wages cut the most, but are completely excluded from the statistics! Those made unemployed / redundant.
    Presumably they are excluded because they’re focused on employer costs and not employee standard of living?
    Now that unemployment is higher I imagine new any hires will be offered less than they otherwise would have been too.

    Like

  2. ultram tramadol Avatar

    Well i hope the issue of unemployment will resolve soon. It was more painful when you are jobless, right?

    Like

  3. Michael Taft Avatar

    Yes, Mack, there is a probability that new entrants will get less than the going rate – with the probably exception of those enterprises covered by collective trade union agreements.

    Like

  4. Tipster Avatar

    Not related to the post — I am using this in the absence of an email address!
    I could be way off, but I imagine that the games at http://www.dreamscape.com/rvien/ might interest. For instance, the Keynes game is at http://www.dreamscape.com/rvien/Economics/Applets/Keynes/Keynes.html

    Like

  5. Michael Taft Avatar

    Tipster – that is so cool! I’ve put it up on a new post. Thanks for that.

    Like

  6. Pavement Trauma Avatar

    The problem with looking at quarter on quarter changes is that seasonality has to be taken into account. For example in the financial sector annual bonuses are typically paid in Q1. There seems to be a similar though less pronouced effect in the manufacturing sector.
    If you compare year on year the average financial manager’s hourly pay has gone from ~€48 in Q1 2008 to ~€40 Q1 2009, a 17% decrease.

    Like

  7. Michael Taft Avatar

    Pavement Trauma – I take your point re: bonus increases in the first quarter. However, there is something strange going on here. In the financial sector, management received bonus increases in the first quarter while clerical and production workers found theirs cut. This also occurred in the manufacturing sector. This compounds the increase in pay for the management while clerical and production workers had their pay cut. Now either we share the pain or we don’t.
    I also take your point re: the yearly decrease in management earnings, though I would point out this is entirely due to bonus payments. Base pay still rose. And management seems determined to reverse this downward trend – in the last six months management pay has increased by 11 percent. One of the ways this can be done, without increasing business costs, is to cut the pay (including bonuses) of those lower down the corporate chain.
    Personally, I don’t get too undone by these trends. We’ve been living with them for a long time. For instance, between 2006-1st quarter and 2009-1st quarter, management has gained €6.48 per hour in base pay(or 22%) while clerical workers gained 70 cents (or less than 4%).
    The more things don’t change, the more they don’t.

    Like

  8. Tipster Avatar

    Three items in this morning’s Guardian on excessive pay (a news item, an op-ed piece by Vince Cable and a letter signed by more than 90 people). What chance we might catch that particular virus.

    Like

Leave a reply to Tipster Cancel reply

Navigation

About

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU