Notes on the Front

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU

Dear Sarah

This was originally written for Irish Left Review

Recession 147 Dear Sarah

I read with interest your recent Irish Times column - 'Nemesis for decades of cosy consensus on tax‘. I was particularly struck by the following:

‘When asked who should pay tax so that there’s enough money to fund the most generous social welfare payments in the EU, we are back to – you’ve guessed it – the tax exiles.’

I’m assuming you mean that the Irish social welfare system makes the most generous payments in the EU. What do you base this on? What is your source for this statement? I would clearly appreciate knowing because the data I have come across suggests, far from being the ‘most generous’, the Irish social welfare system is one of the more parsimonious.

The OECD produces an interesting cross-country comparison of wages, taxes and unemployment benefits. The latest year it has data for is 2006. This is the information it produces.

Sarah 1 If you are an unemployed single person, you’re not doing well in Ireland.  We are the third least generous in the EU-15.  Our basic unemployment payment is 29 percent below the average of other EU-15 countries.  Even poorer countries such as Portugal and Spain make higher payments.  Now if we were Luxembourg, you’re argument about the ‘most generous‘ might hold water.

In addition, Irish welfare payments to the single unemployed makes up only 34 percent of net take-home pay, again the 3rd worst in the EU-15 tables.  The average in the other countries is 58 percent with, again, plucky Luxembourg paying out 85 percent of net take-home pay.

Just a couple of notes on this data:

  • First, these figures relate to a wage of approximately €29,960 – the average private sector pay in Ireland (you might be interested to know that we Irish are paid substantially less than our EU-counterparts; the average private sector pay in the other EU-15 countries is €33,798; we are paid over 11 percent below average.  If we compare ourselves to the average pay in the ten wealthiest EU countries, we fall over 23 percent below average).

  • Second, I have focused on the base unemployment payment, excluding housing benefit for all countries.  While we have rent and mortgage supplements, a large majority of the unemployed don’t receive these payments and of those that do, most do not draw down the maximum amount available.  This creates some problems in comparison since in some countries, housing costs are calculated in the basic unemployment benefit (e.g. France), but the explanatory tables to the OECD data don’t suggest this skewers the data by a significant amount.  We are still paid well below average.

Sarah 2 When it comes to comparing payments for a married couple with two children (and here I use the Irish average industrial wage of €38,000) Ireland does better, thankfully.  Payments are somewhat above average – in the mid-table.  But, again, I would hardly describe this average performance as the ‘most generous‘ in Europe.  And still, we don’t manage to pay the average replacement rate as pertains in the other countries.  An Irish couple with two children will only receive 52 percent of their net take-home pay.  In other EU-15 countries the average is 59 percent.

However, none of the above takes into account living standards.  This is important to factor in because, as I’m sure you are aware Sarah, a Euro in France or Spain goes a lot further than a Euro in Ireland when it comes to buying goods and services.  To factor this in we have to apply Power Purchasing Parities (PPPs) which evens out living standards throughout all countries and makes comparisons more valid.  What happens when we do this?

Well, for the single person in Ireland, the unemployment payment they receive is worth even less in comparison with EU-15 countries.  In Ireland, the payment would be worth €7,245; in the other countries – €11,699.  That’s 38 percent below the average.

And when you apply PPPs to payments made to couples with two children, the Irish payment falls below the average in the other EU-15 countries.

Now, of course, you might have been referring to other aspects of our ‘most generous‘ social welfare system.  Maybe you had in mind old age pensions.  But the OECD’s database, Pensions at a Glance, shows that Irish replacement ratios (pension income as a percentage of pre-retirement earnings) is less than half the OECD average.  In Ireland, an average income earner can expect 38 percent of their pre-retirement income as a pension; the OECD average is 76 percent.

Maybe you had in mind lone parents – except that lone parents are more at risk of poverty here than almost anywhere else in the entire EU.

Maybe you had in mind disability benefits, but I suspect we would see similar patterns since these benefit levels are pegged at our low unemployment payment levels.

The fact is, Sarah, that we do not have a ‘generous‘ welfare system, we have an anaemic one. But what would you expect?  We have a relatively low-waged structure.  Historically, we have a low level of public expenditure (though this is changing slightly with rising levels of unemployment driving the fiscal deficit).  Indeed, low-tax, low-spend countries – of which Ireland has been the global poster child – don’t have generous welfare systems, or generous public services, or top class  infrastructures.

I look forward to hearing how you substantiate your assertion that Ireland has the ‘most generous‘ welfare system in the EU.  Or, failing that, reading your correction in your next Irish Times opinion piece.

Yours sincerely

Michael Taft

PS.  You also mentioned that ‘you have no idea what middle-income means’.  The following might give you some idea.  The latest EU Survey on Income and Living Conditionssuggests that the ‘middle income’ household – with three people (one person working full-time, one working part-time or a dependent, and one child) – earned a little over €35,000 per year from work in 2007.  In addition, they received €12,000 in social transfers (pension, Child Benefit, etc.).  After tax-income for the entire household was €43,000 for three people to live on.  Okay, this is a statistical construct – but it captures the ‘middle-income’.  After mortgage/rent, utilities, VHI, childcare, transport to work, and, of course, purchasing the Irish Times, it ain’t much.  And this is before the recession kicks in!

16 responses to “Dear Sarah”

  1. Jer Avatar

    Paul Krugman’s book Peddling Prosperity talks about how as academic Economics became more academic and retreated to the Ivory Tower space was taken up those commentators with agendas who were not good enough to cut it out as real economists. Economic Witch doctoring was born (my words).
    We have a fair few Economic witch doctors here peddling prosperity

    Like

  2. Alec Avatar

    Hi Michael,
    here’s a link to the SF proposals on tackling unemployment. Would love to see your analysis
    http://www.ardfheis.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/jobcreationdocumentweb.pdf

    Like

  3. Ciarán Avatar

    That’s not fair Jer. Lots of academic economists are prepared to shill for neoliberal agendas.

    Like

  4. Tomaltach Avatar

    Excellent post. You should write a concise version as a letter to the Times and focus on the welfare payments data.

    Like

  5. WorldbyStorm Avatar
    WorldbyStorm

    Excellent post (as ever), pertinent questions…

    Like

  6. Jer Avatar

    Hi Ciaran, I think its fairly fair because I am talking about Sarah Carey’s prescriptions on our Economic future. I am most certainly not talking about this site but rather the phenomenon of journalistic economists. But you are right surely many supped at the Devil’s table including academics

    Like

  7. Fergal Avatar

    Hi Michael,
    As a resident of a “failing” economy(France)it would be interesting to include what could be termed applied social welfare eg 1
    accessible,affordable and professional childcare,our youngest goes to a parent-run crèche one day a week for 45 euros a month.
    2 a child play/drop in centre with on-site childcare professionals(psychologist,nurse,childcare staff etc) at 2 euros a pop
    3 A “ludothèque” where toys/games can be borrowed like in a library,membership is 9 euros a month.
    Just a few examples of “applied” social welfare.Each one is funded by the state in various guises.None of the above would show up in a comparison based only on payments.

    Like

  8. Ciarán Avatar

    Sorry Jer – the ‘that’s unfair’ comment was a misplaced attempt at wit! Something I ought never attempt…
    You are of course correct – ill-informed knee-jerk commentary is the order of the day. But quite a few Irish economists have been pushing agendas rooted in poor just-so theorising (though there are some more nuanced voices out there). At least Sarah Carey doesn’t claim any more authority than as a commentator.

    Like

  9. Hugh Green Avatar

    Just caught your Prime Time appearance, Mr Taft. Good job! (Though I suggest you’ve now used up RTE’s sane economic commentary quota for the calendar year)

    Like

  10. Jer Avatar

    Hi Ciarán,
    Dont let me catch you at that type of thing again!
    :)

    Like

  11. Donagh Avatar

    Yea, well done Michael! Not used to getting such surprises while watching Prime Time. You got the last word in too. Miriam saying a number of times that we can’t afford it and you saying that the money’s there. I agree with Hugh, it can only go downhill from here.

    Like

  12. James Avatar

    Just watched Prime Time now – congratulations on a great “performance” Michael! I particularly liked your suggestion that MNCs are going to find it a bit odd when they set up here and are told to boil their drinking water…

    Like

  13. CMK Avatar

    Yes, well done Michael on your Prime Time appearance, I almost fell of the sofa when Miriam introduced you! And the boiling water point is particularly well made, given that areas where there are water problems (Galway in particular) are also places were the medical device sector is concentrated and where the jobs that are there will need to move up the value chain (to use a cliché) pretty soon. If public squalor continues there’ll be no private affluence, something our numbskull commentariat seem determined to deny. Anyway, hopefully you’ll be called on a bit to provide some much needed balance.
    BTW, I see that Sarah has, perhaps wisely, ignored your correction but instead has lashed the Labour Party for its stance on fees and, from I can, not being a truly “left-wing” party.

    Like

  14. James Avatar

    I’m fairly sure it was also Sarah Carey that wrote an extraordinary piece about the ESB a few weeks ago which demonstrated only that she had no clue about the way the energy sector works – slamming the ESB for its prices with not a mention of the role of the regulator in setting those same prices!
    But sure noone ever said you had to know what you’re talking about to have a weekly newspaper column…

    Like

  15. Michael Taft Avatar

    First, thanks for the comments re: my Prime Time appearance. It was my first time doing such a gig. I felt like the constant critic from the sidelines suddenly being told I had to go on the pitch and actually kick the ball.
    Fergal, that is a very interesting insight into one country’s social welfare benefits. I suspect there are similar initiatives in other ‘over-taxed, over-waged, over-regulated failed economies’ (like Sweden, Denmark, etc.). I wish someone would fund a project to do a comprehensvie comparison of all such social protection measures in various countries. I’d say we wouldn’t rate very high.
    Tomaltach, CMK – I believe Sarah has been in contact with Irish Left Review regarding the letter and hopefully she’ll respond. That way, the debate may get into the mainstream media.
    James, you’re right. It was Sarah revealing her comprehensive knowledge of price setting in the Irish electricity market. I was going to respond but if one were to do that to every misunderstanding of ESB prices, you’d have to start a dedicated blog: Electric Ignorance.

    Like

  16. Michael Mc Loughlin Avatar

    Tut tut, making arguments based on statistics and facts we can’t have that ;-)
    She was defendig junkets for cllrs recently

    Like

Leave a reply to Hugh Green Cancel reply

Navigation

About

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU