Notes on the Front

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU

October 1st Morning: The Recession Diaries

Recession 70 With the Dail debate playing in the background, some notes on what Brian Lenihan insists is not a bail-out.

Professor Morgan Kelly relates an incident at a conference he attended:

'Bankers are well known for getting carried away during bubbles which is why governments appoint central banks to keep an eye on them. You probably think that the fact that Irish banks have given speculators €100 billion to gamble with, safe in the knowledge that taxpayers will cover most losses, is a cause of concern to the Irish Central Bank, but you would be quite wrong. At a recent Irish Economic Association discussion of house prices, the Central Bank official in charge of financial regulation (whose publications with the ultra-libertarian Cato Institute strongly oppose any form of bank regulation: a real case of an atheist being appointed an archbishop) stopped the proceedings to announce that the view of the Bank was that, as long as international markets were happy to buy debt issued by Irish banks, there could be no problem with their lending policies.'

Gives you a lot of confidence, eh?  Michael Hennigan of Finfacts doesn't help:

'Last year, the Central Bank told Finfacts that it did not collect any data on interest-only mortgages, which became standard for investment property purchases in return for a statement of net worth signed by an accountant.'

Michael Casey, who should know something about these things (a former chief economist with the Central Bank), is sceptical about regulation Irish style:

'Opposition politicians have observed that the banks will have to be strictly supervised to ensure they do not use this guarantee to run additional risks. Unfortunately, it will not be possible to monitor this in a satisfactory way. The failure to "prevent" the banks offering 100 per cent mortgages at a late stage in the boom seemed a questionable judgment call. It was recognised fairly early on that property prices had risen significantly above their equilibrium values. It was known that some banks were offering mortgages of up to seven times' salary. It was also known that about one-third of mortgages were for second homes. Thus, there was a general awareness of the existence of a speculative bubble in the property market. Against such a background, it is surprising that the laissez-faire approach was allowed to continue.'

Well, not so surprising given Professor Morgan's story; some people are quite successful at preventing facts from impacting on their ideological worldviews.

Professor Ray Kinsella, who describes the Government's bail-out as a 'radical approach' that will allow the Minister to bring stability to the market and who believes this approach is 'demonstrably superior' to the nationalisation models used in the US, UK and the rest of Europe, made a startling comment on Morning Ireland:

'Regulation won't solve this problem.  It will take ethics and a changed mind-set.'

Oh.  We are now reliant on the same people who recklessly dished up nearly €100 billion to property speculators to have a 'change-of-heart', overseen by the same people who didn't care to even monitor the past few years, never mind intervene, all stood over by the same Government who went out of its way to ensure all this happened.  Oh. 'A changed mind-set'?  How about a change of owners.

But don't fret about getting the information, finding out how bad the situation is within the banks, how dodgy this proposal is or whether this has any chance at all of addressing the fundamental problems in the banking system.  Stephen Collins is emphatic:

'The critical thing, though, was not to do as the Americans have done and hold a long-running debate about the issue, creating more confusion and worry. It was vital to make a clear decision and to stick to it.'

Yeah, democracy's a bitch.

So have no fears:  after the Government announced their bail-out, Anglo Irish shares rocketed upwards by 67 percent; a groovy deal for shareholders.  It is now accepted that Government borrowing will become more costly; a bummer deal for the rest of us.

Oh, well, at least its not raining.  Yet.

3 responses to “October 1st Morning: The Recession Diaries”

  1. Graham Avatar

    Interesting idea from Professor Kelly with respect to the purpose of central banking. “Keeping an eye” on the banks is one way of describing what they do, which is basically to manage the government’s monopoly on the money supply – printing money and fixing interest rates in accordance with the government’s objectives.
    The really interesting question here is why banks all seem to make similar mistakes around the same time. Most people would admit that the banks are usually pretty good at making commercial decisions, but there is something about the business cycle which drives nearly all of them to commit the same types of errors.
    The explanation I find most satisfying is that provided by the Austrian school: that the errors are explained by the false signals given to entrepreneurs in an environment of fixed low interest rates and easy credit. These errors are eventually revealed and that is when we experience the bust.
    Since the boom has typically involved a great deal of leverage, the failed business projects force massive and widespread deleveraging. The banking system is built on a foundation of only fractional reserves, so it becomes seriously threatened as asset prices drop and debts go bad.
    Central banks are faced with the dilemma of choosing between doing nothing and allowing a short-term catastrophe as the economy radically readjusts to the new conditions, or printing enough money to keep as many businesses in operation as they can, risking destruction of the currency through hyperinflation.
    The literature on this subject is really excellent and present-day proponents of the theory have devised some hugely successful investment strategies.

    Like

  2. Niall Avatar

    First of all within the Eurozone, Governments have no control over printing money. The current French Govt. would love that power but thanks to our good friends in the ECB, they don’t.
    Banks throughout Europe have not made the same mistakes throughout Europe, let alone Europe. The problems of Ireland & the smaller regional banks of Spain are not repeated anywhere else in Europe, e.g Santander or the Basque Banks inside Spain. Indeed if you look at the problems created to date in Germany, there is a common link, Ireland.
    I don’t notice a queue developing outside Italian or French Banks and even the problems of the Benelux states are different.
    Irish personal debt is the highest in the Eurozone and considerably higher than the US. If that was not bad enough, we then had every second taxi driver imagining himself as an East European property tycoon.
    The reason is simple, Italian personal debt is perhaps 30% of personal debt here.
    Generally the product of a shotgun marriage takes at least 18 years before he or she leaves the nest. This deal of Lenihan’s will see us paying not for our own sins but the sins of others for a lot longer.
    It was time to let Anglo Irish & INBS to go under. Time to see Seán Quinn back drawing sand and Bernard McNamara ploughing the rocks of bawn.

    Like

  3. Conor McCabe Avatar

    CEO of Irish Life and Permanent, Denis Casey, actually had the jockey bollicks neck of a nerve to go on RTE this morning and say that what is going on at the moment is simply part of an “economic cycle” and the normal losses that occur under this “economic cycle” the banks are more than able to cover. No risk to the taxpayer.
    This crisis is to an “economic cycle” what getting fucked with a broken snooker cue is to making love.
    What an absolute prick.

    Like

Leave a comment

Navigation

About

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU