Notes on the Front

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU

July 18th Lunchtime: The Recession Diaries

Recession 24 In these recession days we will be inundated with a carnival numbers and percentages.  They will come so thick and fast it will be almost impossible to deal with every sleight-of-hand and three-card trick. But we have to start setting the record straight somewhere so I want to start with Fine Gael’s manipulative use of expenditure figures


Their critique of Fianna Fail’s handmade Exchequer crisis comes from starboard.  A recent example comes from Richard Bruton, TD, their Finance spokesperson, during a recent Dail debate on the Government cutbacks.  He claimed:


‘He (Brian Cowen, TD) introduced four inflationary budgets which flew in the face of all the advice he was receiving, and simply damaged the competitive fibre of the economy. In each budget he increased spending far in excess in the growth of national income, expanding spending by 50% in just four budgets, double the rate of growth in the economy over the same years.’



Wow, expenditure growth doubling economic growth.  No wonder we’re in the poorhouse.  This is not sustainable.  This cannot stand.  Except, this is all nonsense.  Here’s an example of how these stat games are played:


Between 2003 and 2007 the number of trips by Irish residents to Africa increased by 77 per cent, whereas trips to other EU countries increased by only 29 per cent.  So are we abandoning Paris for safari hunting in Botswana or grooving to the vibe in Senegal?  Actual trips to Africa increased by only 800 while trips to other EU countries rose by 9,000.  The difference is that the African trips rose off such a low number.


Fine Gael does the same thing with expenditure figures.  Let’s put it in another, more truthful context.  Voted current expenditure (that is, the day-to-day expenditure voted by the Dail and which Fine Gael uses) was 24.7 per cent of GNP in 2004.  Four budgets later, that same expenditure was 26.7 per cent.  An increase, yes but hardly one to go to the barricades over – even if you’re a neo-liberal. 


If you go back to 2001, the increase in expenditure, as a percentage of GNP, actually declined by half a per cent.


See, how fun it is to play these games.  Except this is no laughing matter and there is another story to be told.  The recent NESC report shows that Ireland lags near the bottom of current expenditure among EU-15 countries.  We’d have to spend nearly €12 billion more per year just to reach the average.


The question I have for Fine Gael (when it raises its head above these neo-liberal obsession with fractions of percentages) and all other supporters of a low-tax, low-spend economy: how in the world are we going to achieve a European level of services without a European level of expenditure?


In recession times you don’t expect everything to get better overnight.  But in the temporary darkness we should expect some honesty.

One response to “July 18th Lunchtime: The Recession Diaries”

  1. Niall Avatar

    I came across the following quote from the chief economist of FÁS, Brian McCormick;
    “There are already signs that some of the external problems facing the economy are having a direct impact on the labour market. Specifically, employment in the transport & communications sector has stagnated in the face of higher oil prices while manufacturing employment has been falling as exporters try to trim payroll costs in response to the appreciation of the euro. A significant migratory response should soften the blow of negative employment growth on unemployment. Nevertheless, the numbers on the Live Register will rise further and are likely to reach 250,000 by the end of the year. ”
    I just love the phrase “a significant migratory response”. Why not just use old Brian Lenihan’s phrase “Emigration is good”

    Like

Leave a reply to Niall Cancel reply

Navigation

About

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU