Notes on the Front

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU

Game Over, Game Over

Tictacto Read through Enterprise-Ireland’s Annual Reports and you might think that everything’s all right on the native enterprise front. Exports are increasing, new companies are coming on stream while current companies are expanding. Targets are being met on a range of benchmarks – R&D, investment, innovation, etc.  Sure, it could be better, but we’re moving in the right direction. We can all go back to sleep and vote Fianna Fail.

This is one gloss. Unfortunately, there’s another read which is not so encouraging.

More and more people are jumping on the ‘we’re not producing enough’ bandwagon as the realisation hits that buying and selling houses is not a sustainable way to grow an economy, and that we’ve hocked large parts of our economic homestead to multi-national capital. Hopefully there will be more jumpers – there’s plenty of room on the wagon.

But the Forfas Annual Business Survey makes for extremely sobering, and not a little depressing, reading. For it shows not only how far we have to go to break our addiction to foreign capital but further, how in the last few years we’ve being going in the wrong direction.

We should all be familiar now with the shameful fact that our export base – both manufacturing and internationally traded services – is heavily dependent on the MNC sector. And it’s been getting worse.

Game_over_2Not only are indigenous exports declining relative to the foreign-owned sector, the Irish-owned export sector remains heavily dependent on one industry – food and drink – which accounts for nearly 70% of Irish-owned manufacturing exports. If we remove the multi-national sector, we are practically a single-industry economy in terms of manufacturing exports.

It’s not that Irish-owned exports have decreased, it’s just that they have not kept pace with MNC growth. And therein lies another tale.

In the last five years the Irish-owned sector put in a poor performance, much lower than even the period that preceded the Celtic Tiger years. Indeed, were it not for the internationally traded services sector (which makes up only 20% of exports), the Irish-owned sector would have declined.

Game_over_1 One of the problems is that the numbers and tables produced by official agencies can be easily manipulated. For instance, when criticisms are raised about our export performance and, by extension, Government enterprise policy, Ministers are capable of pumping some interesting numbers. Poor performance? Why sure, didn’t exports from the international traded services sector increase by over 11%? And this is the cutting edge of the new knowledge economy.

There’s a bit of ‘devil in the details’ to all this. When hard numbers are produced it looks a lot less impressive.

Game_over_3Yes, service exports are rising. Since 2000, they have increased by €650 million. But what does that mean in the grand scheme of things? Percentage growth looks good because we are working from a low base. When we put numbers on growth, we can see that Irish-owned service exports growth contributed to about 3% of all export growth.

We shouldn’t blame Enterprise-Ireland for talking up the situation. That’s what they’re there for. You wouldn’t want the CEO to launch an Annual Report by throwing up his hands, rolling his head, and muttering into the microphone, ‘Game over, game over, game over.’ No, God loves triers. And Enterprise-Ireland is trying.

The problem is that they, and we, are hamstrung by two (at least) long-term chronic conditions: the historical failure to create a native enterprise class that can compete internationally, and Government policy that believes its only a matter of getting the ‘economic climate’ right (low tax, low regulations, etc.).

Until we face up to those two challenges, the ‘economic climate’ is going to look pretty dreary. When Government ministers are not mystifying us (and driving Finfacts’ Michael Hennigan to distraction) with spin and sunny prognostications, they retreat to a ‘ look at this way, it could be worse, it could be raining’.

Well, look out the window. It already is.

6 responses to “Game Over, Game Over”

  1. Aidan OSullivan Avatar
    Aidan OSullivan

    Good post.
    The frightening thing is how pathetic the opposition parties are at making this point. I doubt FF fully understand it either.
    One of the main problems is that our current generation of politicians (and media!) are obsessed with 20th century indicators like ‘number of jobs’ and GDP/GNP which are proving inadequate for a 21st century global economy.
    I know from personal experience how Irish IT companies are always out bid for talented staff by the MNCs. Everyone wants to keep the MNCs here, but nobody knows yet if we can grow the Irish export sector at the same time.

    Like

  2. jim Avatar

    I am secure at all in my financial based opinions. I know that I understand the balance only at a glance. I would love to see more arguement and persuasion given to our possible means of growth. For example, Aidan talks of increased global business while Michael talks down the importance of increases in MNC activity by the continuing focus on Native Enterprise. Surley to bed down some strong financial institiutions would be a benefit to the economy, and surely the global economy is morphing away from who does business in your country to what business is done. Perhaps in there with innovation etc. another export of ours can be consultancy in how to have business locate on your shores. As I say I am looking more for an explanation to assist my understanding

    Like

  3. jim Avatar

    Sorry begining of last post should have read ‘not secure at all ‘,

    Like

  4. WorldbyStorm Avatar

    Wow, that’s a depressing, or sobering, prognosis. Quite scary really.

    Like

  5. Michael Avatar

    Aiden, you’re probably right about FF not understanding it – if you mean by ‘it’, the ability to grow our native economy. In the past they tried – particularly Lemass. He banged his head off the wall with tariffs and protectionism, subsidies and finally foreign capital. Even Martin O’Donoghue under the Lynch Government engaged in what has been called ‘vulgar’ keynesianism – to try to pump-prime native business. Nothing has worked – certainly not like the IDA’s mission to bring foreign capital here. I can understand Labour’s reluctance to jump in on this and related issues – can you imagine being on ‘Q&A’ and having a right go at a Government Minister and John Bowman crawls all over you with ‘Well, what would you do?’ Labour doesn’t have that answer but as I said, even Lemass threw up his hands at the problem.
    Jim, in no way did I mean to ‘talk down’ MNC activity here. Indeed, we are fortunate to have them here because if they weren’t, this place would be a wasteland industrially. I hope more come. That’s why I’m dubious about calls to increase the Corporate Tax rate at this time. If I distinguish between MNC and native enterprise, it is not to disparage the former but rather the latter. Future reliance on the MNC sector, however, is unsustainable.
    Don’t be depressed, WBS. Being on the Left is fun! (it had better be because our trophy case is pretty empty). Yes, the economics of native enterprise is a bit ‘scary’ but I recall one of those interminable war stories from my youth, about how a frightened young Captain reported to his veteran Colonel that their position was entirely surrounded. ‘Good’ said the Colonel. ‘We have the enemy right where we want them.’ Just as the Captain thought his superior was mad, the Colonel explained: ‘Now, no matter which direction we shoot, we’re bound to hit the enemy.’

    Like

  6.  Avatar

    Michael, why in an increasingly, globally, mobile, corporate sector are MNC’s not sustainable. Are they not inevitable as a major and continuing source of business activity?

    Like

Leave a reply to Michael Cancel reply

Navigation

About

Commentary on Irish Political Economy by Michael Taft, researcher for SIPTU